An audit evaluating quality and completeness of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) form documentation at Bradford Royal Infirmary

Submitted: April 5, 2024
Accepted: July 19, 2024
Published: August 20, 2024
Abstract Views: 43
PDF: 20
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) form was created and implemented to encourage discussion and standardize documentation of advance care decisions for emergency management. To assess the completion of the ReSPECT form documentation at Bradford Royal Infirmary. Section 4 received special attention: "The quality of the clinical recommendations". In December 2022, data were collected retrospectively from patients' notes. To make comparisons easier, the data was converted to percentages. This was followed by an intervention that included education sessions, posters, and the implementation of required changes. Following that, a second audit cycle was conducted in February 2023 to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness. All audited forms were found in the appropriate patient files. Section 4, "The clinical recommendations for emergency care and treatment," revealed that all forms contained a signed "Do Not Attempt CPR" box and that this information was correctly transferred to the Electronic Patient Record (EPR). However, only 20% of the forms had the free text box filled out with information about the patient's needs and wants, and only 50% of the audited forms had completed subsection 1 in Section 4. The information requested on the ReSPECT form could be extremely useful if provided in greater detail. However, the forms suffer from a significant lack of data, which limits their intended utility. Furthermore, each transcription of the form lowers the quality of the data provided.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Citations

Resuscitation Council UK. ReSPECT [Internet]. Resus.org.uk. Resuscitation Council UK; 2015. Available from: https://www.resus.org.uk/respect
Eli K, Hawkes CA, Fritz Z, et al. Assessing the quality of ReSPECT documentation using an accountability for reasonableness framework. Resuscitation Plus 2021;7:100145.
Fritz Z, Slowther AM, Perkins GD. Resuscitation policy should focus on the patient, not the decision. BMJ 2017;356:813
Fritz Z, Fuld J, Haydock S, Palmer C. Interpretation and intent: A study of the (mis)understanding of DNAR orders in a teaching hospital. Resuscitation 2010;81:1138–41.
Harris D, Davies R. An audit of “do not attempt resuscitation” decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing? Postgraduate Med J 2007;83:137–40.
Fritz Z, Cork N, Dodd A, Malyon A. DNACPR decisions: challenging and changing practice in the wake of the Tracey judgment. Clinical Medicine 2014;14:571–6.
Mockford C, Fritz Z, George R, et al. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation. Resuscitation 2015;88:99–113.
Eli K, Hawkes CA, Fritz Z, et al. Assessing the quality of ReSPECT documentation using an accountability for reasonableness framework. Resuscitation Plus 2021;7:100145.
Wu CHK, Luk SMH, Holder RL, et al. How do paper and electronic records compare for completeness? A three centre study. Eye 2018;32:1232–6.
Wu CHK, Luk SMH, Holder RL, et al. How do paper and electronic records compare for completeness? A three centre study. Eye 2018;32:1232–6.
Council R. Criteria for auditing and evaluating the ReSPECT process and suggested measures for service evaluation in Secondary/Tertiary care. online: Resus Council; 2022 Nov p. 4.
Rowe N, Ilic D. What impact do posters have on academic knowledge transfer? A pilot survey on author attitudes and experiences. BMC Medical Education 2009;9:71.
Hasanica N, Catak A, Mujezinovic A, et al. The Effectiveness of Leaflets and Posters as a Health Education Method. Materia Socio Medica 2020;32:135.

How to Cite

Khalid, H., Boyle, A., & Yiasemidou, M. (2024). An audit evaluating quality and completeness of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) form documentation at Bradford Royal Infirmary. Surgery in Geriatrics and Frailty, 1(1). Retrieved from https://www.sigaf.eu/site/article/view/12